<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for poetics.info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poetics.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://poetics.info</link>
	<description>Because creating is living...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tea Partiers and the GOP:  An Uneasy Alliance by mike houston</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2010/09/16/tea-partiers-and-the-gop-an-uneasy-alliance/comment-page-1/#comment-11786</link>
		<dc:creator>mike houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/?p=353#comment-11786</guid>
		<description>The most glaring omission in Tea Party&#039;s point of view is how to actually make our government smaller.  What, specifically, do Tea Party&#039;ers want to cut?  A very simple exercise that I would encourage people of all political persuasions to undertake is to pull out a pie chart of current government expenditures (federal or state) and try to significantly reduce the pie in a way that you can live with.  Then think about the effects those cuts will have on others.  I&#039;m not suggesting it can&#039;t be done, but I am suggesting that it will be a sobering exercise -- one that is likely to move us all beyond slogans and platitudes, and instead to the more deliberative thinking that this country desperately needs from its politicians and citizens alike right now. 

I commend the Tea Party for raising the profile of this issue -- it is a discussion very much worth having.  However, absent those discussions, and absent any concrete proposals for achieving the party&#039;s stated ideals, I remain skeptical that the Tea Party is anything more than the flames of wishful thinking fanned by a Republican party that wants to take back Congress and the White House at any cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most glaring omission in Tea Party&#8217;s point of view is how to actually make our government smaller.  What, specifically, do Tea Party&#8217;ers want to cut?  A very simple exercise that I would encourage people of all political persuasions to undertake is to pull out a pie chart of current government expenditures (federal or state) and try to significantly reduce the pie in a way that you can live with.  Then think about the effects those cuts will have on others.  I&#8217;m not suggesting it can&#8217;t be done, but I am suggesting that it will be a sobering exercise &#8212; one that is likely to move us all beyond slogans and platitudes, and instead to the more deliberative thinking that this country desperately needs from its politicians and citizens alike right now. </p>
<p>I commend the Tea Party for raising the profile of this issue &#8212; it is a discussion very much worth having.  However, absent those discussions, and absent any concrete proposals for achieving the party&#8217;s stated ideals, I remain skeptical that the Tea Party is anything more than the flames of wishful thinking fanned by a Republican party that wants to take back Congress and the White House at any cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ideas Matter:  Bailout Would Be Socialist Win by Rich</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2008/09/26/ideas-matter-bailout-would-be-socialist-win/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2008/09/26/ideas-matter-bailout-would-be-socialist-win/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>No bailout.  Let the companies fail for their poor decision making and let the chips fall where they may.  The stock market used to be a place where companies could acquire capital to manufacture goods.  For the last 10 to 20 years it&#039;s morphed into a place for companies to try to make money just from the notion of shuffling money around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No bailout.  Let the companies fail for their poor decision making and let the chips fall where they may.  The stock market used to be a place where companies could acquire capital to manufacture goods.  For the last 10 to 20 years it&#8217;s morphed into a place for companies to try to make money just from the notion of shuffling money around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the World Will Not End:  A Great Letter from John Mauldin by Rich</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2008/07/22/why-the-world-will-not-end-a-great-letter-from-john-mauldin/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2008/07/22/why-the-world-will-not-end-a-great-letter-from-john-mauldin/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>To paraphrase the late comedian Bill Hicks:

&quot;I&#039;m waiting for a great  nightly newscast.  &#039;Hey everybody -- it&#039;s all going to work out .  Here&#039;s Tom with the weather!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase the late comedian Bill Hicks:</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m waiting for a great  nightly newscast.  &#8216;Hey everybody &#8212; it&#8217;s all going to work out .  Here&#8217;s Tom with the weather!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update on Part II: Why Obama Scares Me by Frank</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2008/07/22/update-on-part-ii-why-obama-scares-me/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2008/07/22/update-on-part-ii-why-obama-scares-me/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Good to see you back. 

 As you say: No real need any longer to put cursor to screen about Hillary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you back. </p>
<p> As you say: No real need any longer to put cursor to screen about Hillary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quincy the dog by Laura</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2008/02/21/quincy-the-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2008/02/21/quincy-the-dog/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>How funny! I have to tell Kelsey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How funny! I have to tell Kelsey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trace Bundy on Guitar by Trace Bundy: Acoustic &#8220;Sweet Child O&#8217; Mine&#8221; :: Mudita Journal</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2008/02/27/trace-bundy-on-guitar/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace Bundy: Acoustic &#8220;Sweet Child O&#8217; Mine&#8221; :: Mudita Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2008/02/27/trace-bundy-on-guitar/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] couldn&#8217;t agree more with Allison Taylor: Iâ€™m not the biggest fan of Guns â€˜n Roses, but I do love this song (Sweet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couldn&#8217;t agree more with Allison Taylor: Iâ€™m not the biggest fan of Guns â€˜n Roses, but I do love this song (Sweet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quincy the dog by Anne</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2008/02/21/quincy-the-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2008/02/21/quincy-the-dog/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great!  She obviously got some of the artistic genes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great!  She obviously got some of the artistic genes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Are Not a Democracy by Allison Taylor</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2007/05/19/we-are-not-a-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2007/05/19/we-are-not-a-democracy/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Hi, Cathryn,
Thanks for writing. I do write poetry, but I haven&#039;t published anything. I never feel like my poems are quite finished and often tweak them years later. For me, poetry is more cathartic.

I&#039;ll have to check out renovation magazineâ€¦

~Allison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Cathryn,<br />
Thanks for writing. I do write poetry, but I haven&#8217;t published anything. I never feel like my poems are quite finished and often tweak them years later. For me, poetry is more cathartic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to check out renovation magazineâ€¦</p>
<p>~Allison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Are Not a Democracy by Cathryn flowers Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2007/05/19/we-are-not-a-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathryn flowers Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2007/05/19/we-are-not-a-democracy/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>out mistakes often work out to good.

I was writing an article this week for a renovation mag. It was the 4th I had to do in three days. I was plum out of adjectives. The wrought iron gates, window treatments, etc. were elegant and beautiful. But, my article was like dull mush. So, I went to a fancier home mag and found some good adjectives. Some I incorporated immediately and some I just typed at the top of the page for further reference. After finishing the article, sent it in. My editor called later and thought the article was great, especially the two one word sentences: Adorn. Abundant.

What a hoot!
MomCat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>out mistakes often work out to good.</p>
<p>I was writing an article this week for a renovation mag. It was the 4th I had to do in three days. I was plum out of adjectives. The wrought iron gates, window treatments, etc. were elegant and beautiful. But, my article was like dull mush. So, I went to a fancier home mag and found some good adjectives. Some I incorporated immediately and some I just typed at the top of the page for further reference. After finishing the article, sent it in. My editor called later and thought the article was great, especially the two one word sentences: Adorn. Abundant.</p>
<p>What a hoot!<br />
MomCat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Are Not a Democracy by Cathryn flowers Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2007/05/19/we-are-not-a-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathryn flowers Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2007/05/19/we-are-not-a-democracy/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I went to your blog because it mentioned the wpaf in march. Noticed the poetics....

Do you write poetry? where?

Enjoyed this little blurb.
Thanks,
Cathryn flowers Ritchie
p.s. I&#039;m in winter park, panera, as I write...still trying to wake up. Writing and organizing.  Didn&#039;t quite read the above reply info required. When it said, Mail, I put female....duhhh. Came back and I looked a little closer...OH, my email address.  Shows you how I often get the whole message but miss the little details. Sometimes silly mistakes and others, not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to your blog because it mentioned the wpaf in march. Noticed the poetics&#8230;.</p>
<p>Do you write poetry? where?</p>
<p>Enjoyed this little blurb.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Cathryn flowers Ritchie<br />
p.s. I&#8217;m in winter park, panera, as I write&#8230;still trying to wake up. Writing and organizing.  Didn&#8217;t quite read the above reply info required. When it said, Mail, I put female&#8230;.duhhh. Came back and I looked a little closer&#8230;OH, my email address.  Shows you how I often get the whole message but miss the little details. Sometimes silly mistakes and others, not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

