<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Giuliani Run as an Independent?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poetics.info/2007/05/12/will-giuliani-run-as-an-independent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://poetics.info/2007/05/12/will-giuliani-run-as-an-independent/</link>
	<description>Because creating is living...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Taylor</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2007/05/12/will-giuliani-run-as-an-independent/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2007/05/12/will-giuliani-run-as-an-independent/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>While I agree with Ron Paul on many issues, I disagree with his stance on the Middle East. I think his statement (or inference) that the U.S. deserved 9/11 is appalling. I can&#039;t defend U.S. foreign policy in 1952, but the U.S. acted in response to Iranian prime minister Mohammed Mossadeq&#039;s agressive action to nationalize Britain&#039;s largest petroleum company. (Incidentally, Chavez has seized control of American oil companies in Venezuela, and he has announced his intention to pursue nuclear arms. I guess Ron Paul would say we caused this, too?) 

In any event, I don&#039;t think we can afford to be &quot;non-interventionists&quot; now. The Left and the radical Islamists hate America because it represents capitalism, albeit in a very regulated form. They hate &quot;Westernization,&quot; and they see the West as &quot;hegemonic.&quot; They see capitalism as a &quot;global threat&quot; that will destroy the cultures of undeveloped nations. The radical Islamists prefer to live in the Iron Age rather than the Information Age.

As the near bombing in London last night shows, we are continually being targeted by radical Islamists, and if they are not defeated they will be emboldened to launch bigger and deadlier attacks. 

The radical Islamists would like nothing better than for the U.S. to pull out of the Middle East and Iraq. And, if we withdrew, &quot;states&quot; like Hamas&#039; Gaza would quickly form. It would only be a matter of time before they launched a nuclear attack on millions of people in the West, and I include Israel among the West.

Giuliani isn&#039;t a perfect candidate. I have trouble trusting any candidate to do what they say they will do. But, I do think it&#039;s ironic that he&#039;s so heavily attacked by &quot;conservatives,&quot; when he claims to be influenced by the work of the Manhattan Institute and when he writes positively of free market principles and capitalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with Ron Paul on many issues, I disagree with his stance on the Middle East. I think his statement (or inference) that the U.S. deserved 9/11 is appalling. I can&#8217;t defend U.S. foreign policy in 1952, but the U.S. acted in response to Iranian prime minister Mohammed Mossadeq&#8217;s agressive action to nationalize Britain&#8217;s largest petroleum company. (Incidentally, Chavez has seized control of American oil companies in Venezuela, and he has announced his intention to pursue nuclear arms. I guess Ron Paul would say we caused this, too?) </p>
<p>In any event, I don&#8217;t think we can afford to be &#8220;non-interventionists&#8221; now. The Left and the radical Islamists hate America because it represents capitalism, albeit in a very regulated form. They hate &#8220;Westernization,&#8221; and they see the West as &#8220;hegemonic.&#8221; They see capitalism as a &#8220;global threat&#8221; that will destroy the cultures of undeveloped nations. The radical Islamists prefer to live in the Iron Age rather than the Information Age.</p>
<p>As the near bombing in London last night shows, we are continually being targeted by radical Islamists, and if they are not defeated they will be emboldened to launch bigger and deadlier attacks. </p>
<p>The radical Islamists would like nothing better than for the U.S. to pull out of the Middle East and Iraq. And, if we withdrew, &#8220;states&#8221; like Hamas&#8217; Gaza would quickly form. It would only be a matter of time before they launched a nuclear attack on millions of people in the West, and I include Israel among the West.</p>
<p>Giuliani isn&#8217;t a perfect candidate. I have trouble trusting any candidate to do what they say they will do. But, I do think it&#8217;s ironic that he&#8217;s so heavily attacked by &#8220;conservatives,&#8221; when he claims to be influenced by the work of the Manhattan Institute and when he writes positively of free market principles and capitalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Panken</title>
		<link>http://poetics.info/2007/05/12/will-giuliani-run-as-an-independent/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Panken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poetics.info/2007/05/12/will-giuliani-run-as-an-independent/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very hard to understand why you chose ignore Ron Paul&#039;s candidacy.  Guliani&#039;s positions are just a fascade.  Freedom for the individual doesn&#039;t mean anything to him.  He may seem rhetorically not bad.  Compare what he did as mayor to Ron Paul&#039;s record in the House of Represenatives.  You&#039;re just getting sucked in by typical Republican Neo-Conservatism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very hard to understand why you chose ignore Ron Paul&#8217;s candidacy.  Guliani&#8217;s positions are just a fascade.  Freedom for the individual doesn&#8217;t mean anything to him.  He may seem rhetorically not bad.  Compare what he did as mayor to Ron Paul&#8217;s record in the House of Represenatives.  You&#8217;re just getting sucked in by typical Republican Neo-Conservatism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

